It's Cortex-Xn, not Cortex Xn or cortex xn or cortex-xn or CORTEX-Xn
or CortexXn. Further it's Cortex-M0+, not M0plus.
Cf. http://www.arm.com/products/processors/index.php
Consistently write it the official way, so that it stops propagating.
Originally spotted in the documentation, it mainly affects code comments
but also Atmel SAM3/SAM4/SAMV, NiietCM4 and SiM3x flash driver output.
Found via:
git grep -i "Cortex "
git grep -i "Cortex-" | grep -v "Cortex-" | grep -v ".cpu"
git grep -i "CortexM"
Change-Id: Ic7b6ca85253e027f6f0f751c628d1a2a391fe914
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3483
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Marc Schink <openocd-dev@marcschink.de>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
flash: at91sam4: add support for the SAMG53 family (this also covers the
SAMG51). The SAMG5x parts have an EEFC (enhanced embedded flash controller)
which seems to be identical to the EFC that the sam4 driver supports.
Add a script for the Xplained Pro G53 board, this has the onboard CMSIS-DAP
debugger and a SAMG53N19. Tested on this board and chip combination.
Change-Id: I12af50402cd2069b3c7380d92e6fe54816d6c045
Signed-off-by: Andrey Yurovsky <yurovsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1974
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Andreas Färber
Andrey Yurovsky