Commit Graph

7 Commits (3d2d5dcc9c27b84dc2e5e9ed53be0f784a450042)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zachary T Welch 2dfa5e9c84 update 'flash bank' usage in scripts
Sets $_FLASHNAME to "$_CHIPNAME.flash" and passes it as the
first argument to 'flash bank'.
2009-11-19 13:39:41 -08:00
David Brownell f86137066a ARM: "armv4_5" command prefix becomes "arm"
Rename the "armv4_5" command prefix to straight "arm" so it makes
more sense for newer cores.  Add a simple compatibility script.

Make sure all the commands give the same "not an ARM" diagnostic
message (and fail properly) when called against non-ARM targets.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
2009-11-16 16:36:09 -08:00
David Brownell 3e6f9e8d1e target.cfg: remove "-work-area-virt 0"
The semantics of "-work-area-virt 0" (or phys) changed with
the patch to require specifying physical or virtrual work
area addresses.  Specifying zero was previously a NOP.  Now
it means that address zero is valid.

This patch addresses three related issues:

 - MMU-less processors should never specify work-area-virt;
   remove those specifications.  Such processors include
   ARM7TDMI, Cortex-M3, and ARM966.

 - MMU-equipped processors *can* specify work-area-virt...
   but zero won't be appropriate, except in mischievous
   contexts (which hide null pointer exceptions).

   Remove those specs from those processors too.  If any of
   those mappings is valid, someone will need to submit a
   patch adding it ... along with a comment saying what OS
   provides the mapping, and in which context.  Example,
   say "works with Linux 2.6.30+, in kernel mode".  (Note
   that ARM Linux doesn't map kernel memory to zero ...)

 - Clarify docs on that "-virt" and other work area stuff.

Seems to me work-area-virt is quite problematic; not every
operating system provides such static mappings; if they do,
they're not in every MMU context...

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
2009-11-08 08:52:40 -08:00
Freddie Chopin 0da0bfd40a target.cfg: use $_TARGETNAME for flash
This gets rid of runtime warnings from the use of numbers.
STM32 and LPC2103 were tested.  Other LPC updates are the
same, and so are safe.  The CFI updates match other tested
changes now in the tree.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
2009-10-31 11:13:10 -07:00
oharboe 0b11e4dbb4 use "armv4_5 core_state arm" instead of soft_reset_halt, fewer side effects
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2672 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
2009-09-04 11:03:26 +00:00
oharboe ce89c7bf65 David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> "set _TARGETNAME ..." cleanup
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2665 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
2009-09-04 05:17:03 +00:00
ntfreak 59b295dbbe Audrius Urmanavičius [didele.deze@gmail.com]:
Add flash programming support for NXP LPC1700 cortex_m3 based family


git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2579 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
2009-08-13 13:54:53 +00:00