found out why str912 reset halt failed.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@688 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60__archive__
parent
e0d6a125c4
commit
c45984f93e
|
@ -37,7 +37,24 @@
|
|||
bitbang_interface_t *bitbang_interface;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* should the clock be high or low in idle? */
|
||||
/* DANGER!!!! clock absolutely *MUST* be 0 in idle or reset won't work!
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Set this to 1 and str912 reset halt will fail.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If someone can submit a patch with an explanation it will be greatly
|
||||
* appreciated, but as far as I can tell (ØH) DCLK is generated upon
|
||||
* clk=0 in TAP_RTI. Good luck deducing that from the ARM documentation!
|
||||
* The ARM documentation uses the term "DCLK is asserted while in the TAP_RTI
|
||||
* state". With hardware there is no such thing as *while* in a state. There
|
||||
* are only edges. So clk => 0 is in fact a very subtle state transition that
|
||||
* happens *while* in the TAP_RTI state. "#&¤"#¤&"#&"#&
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For "reset halt" the last thing that happens before srst is asserted
|
||||
* is that the breakpoint is set up. If DCLK is not wiggled one last
|
||||
* time before the reset, then the breakpoint is not set up and
|
||||
* "reset halt" will fail to halt.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define CLOCK_IDLE() 0
|
||||
|
||||
int bitbang_execute_queue(void);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue