Remove obsolete tip referring to 2010 removal of TAP numbers.
Remove a tip describing the discouraged use of TAP numbers, and how these numbers would be removed by mid-2010. Change-Id: Iebe7e2e4a0f8e1f18a91d7935588dd9ced2b398d Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1862 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>__archive__
parent
1520e37719
commit
acc67744c0
|
@ -3726,17 +3726,6 @@ The components of a dotted name should follow ``C'' symbol
|
|||
name rules: start with an alphabetic character, then numbers
|
||||
and underscores are OK; while others (including dots!) are not.
|
||||
|
||||
@quotation Tip
|
||||
In older code, JTAG TAPs were numbered from 0..N.
|
||||
This feature is still present.
|
||||
However its use is highly discouraged, and
|
||||
should not be relied on; it will be removed by mid-2010.
|
||||
Update all of your scripts to use TAP names rather than numbers,
|
||||
by paying attention to the runtime warnings they trigger.
|
||||
Using TAP numbers in target configuration scripts prevents
|
||||
reusing those scripts on boards with multiple targets.
|
||||
@end quotation
|
||||
|
||||
@section TAP Declaration Commands
|
||||
|
||||
@c shouldn't this be(come) a {Config Command}?
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue