Invalidate the register cache when rtos_hartid==-1
This means I don't know what hart to look at, so I might as well invalidate the register cache. Without this, you might get stale registers the first time you ask for them.release
parent
faa6123e36
commit
ab77c5d792
|
@ -1017,7 +1017,10 @@ void riscv_set_current_hartid(struct target *target, int hartid)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Avoid invalidating the register cache all the time. */
|
||||
if (r->registers_initialized && (!riscv_rtos_enabled(target) || (previous_hartid == hartid)) && target->reg_cache->reg_list[GDB_REGNO_XPR0].size == (long)riscv_xlen(target)) {
|
||||
if (r->registers_initialized
|
||||
&& (!riscv_rtos_enabled(target) || (previous_hartid == hartid))
|
||||
&& target->reg_cache->reg_list[GDB_REGNO_XPR0].size == (long)riscv_xlen(target)
|
||||
&& (!riscv_rtos_enabled(target) || (r->rtos_hartid != -1))) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("registers already initialized, skipping");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue