zcy
/
tinyriscv-openocd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

riscv-v13: wait for idle in read_memory 

read_memory was doing autoexec-initialized commands, but wasn't using
ac_busy_delay to add delay or wait between the commands. This isn't the optimal
solution, but the whole read_memory sequence needs to be made more efficient
anyway, so this was the quick and dirty solution.
__archive__
Megan Wachs 2017-03-15 17:23:21 -07:00
parent bb39d3b17e
commit a70e628620
1 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c
View File

@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static int read_memory(struct target *target, uint32_t address,
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTCS, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_AUTOEXEC0 | DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR);
uint32_t abstractcs;
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < count; i++) {
uint32_t value = dmi_read(target, DMI_DATA0);
switch (size) {
@ -1885,9 +1885,16 @@ static int read_memory(struct target *target, uint32_t address,
default:
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
// The above dmi_read started an abstract command. If we just
// immediately read here, we'll probably get a busy error. Wait for idle first,
// or otherwise take ac_command_busy into account (this defeats the purpose
// of autoexec, this whole code needs optimization).
if (wait_for_idle(target, &abstractcs) != ERROR_OK) {
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
}
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTCS, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR);
uint32_t abstractcs = dmi_read(target, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
abstractcs = dmi_read(target, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
if (get_field(abstractcs, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR)) {
// TODO: retry with more delay?
return ERROR_FAIL;