git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/chibios/svn/trunk@5348 35acf78f-673a-0410-8e92-d51de3d6d3f4
gdisirio
parent
b92739adaa
commit
9c9c8ee6e5
|
|
@ -31,18 +31,18 @@ static msg_t Thread1(void *arg) {
|
|||
(void)arg;
|
||||
chRegSetThreadName("blinker");
|
||||
while (TRUE) {
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED1);
|
||||
chThdSleepMilliseconds(250);
|
||||
palClearPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED1);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED2);
|
||||
chThdSleepMilliseconds(250);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED1);
|
||||
palClearPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED2);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED3);
|
||||
chThdSleepMilliseconds(250);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED2);
|
||||
palClearPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED3);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED4);
|
||||
chThdSleepMilliseconds(250);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED3);
|
||||
palClearPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED4);
|
||||
chThdSleepMilliseconds(250);
|
||||
palSetPad(GPIOC, GPIOC_LED4);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
|
|||
***************************************************************************
|
||||
Options: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -falign-functions=16
|
||||
Settings: SYSCLK=72, ACR=0x12 (2 wait states)
|
||||
***************************************************************************
|
||||
|
||||
*** ChibiOS/RT test suite
|
||||
***
|
||||
*** Kernel: 2.5.2unstable
|
||||
*** Compiled: Mar 3 2013 - 09:55:54
|
||||
*** Compiler: GCC 4.7.3 20121207 (release) [ARM/embedded-4_7-branch revision 194305]
|
||||
*** Architecture: ARMv7-ME
|
||||
*** Core Variant: Cortex-M4
|
||||
*** Port Info: Advanced kernel mode
|
||||
*** Platform: STM32F37x Analog & DSP
|
||||
*** Test Board: STMicroelectronics STM32373C-EVAL
|
||||
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 1.1 (Threads, enqueuing test #1)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 1.2 (Threads, enqueuing test #2)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 1.3 (Threads, priority change)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 1.4 (Threads, delays)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 2.1 (Semaphores, enqueuing)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 2.2 (Semaphores, timeout)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 2.3 (Semaphores, atomic signal-wait)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 2.4 (Binary Semaphores, functionality)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.1 (Mutexes, priority enqueuing test)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.2 (Mutexes, priority inheritance, simple case)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.3 (Mutexes, priority inheritance, complex case)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.4 (Mutexes, priority return)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.5 (Mutexes, status)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.6 (CondVar, signal test)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.7 (CondVar, broadcast test)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 3.8 (CondVar, boost test)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 4.1 (Messages, loop)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 5.1 (Mailboxes, queuing and timeouts)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 6.1 (Events, registration and dispatch)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 6.2 (Events, wait and broadcast)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 6.3 (Events, timeouts)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 7.1 (Heap, allocation and fragmentation test)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 8.1 (Memory Pools, queue/dequeue)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 9.1 (Dynamic APIs, threads creation from heap)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 9.2 (Dynamic APIs, threads creation from memory pool)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 9.3 (Dynamic APIs, registry and references)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 10.1 (Queues, input queues)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 10.2 (Queues, output queues)
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.1 (Benchmark, messages #1)
|
||||
--- Score : 263081 msgs/S, 526162 ctxswc/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.2 (Benchmark, messages #2)
|
||||
--- Score : 212496 msgs/S, 424992 ctxswc/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.3 (Benchmark, messages #3)
|
||||
--- Score : 212496 msgs/S, 424992 ctxswc/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.4 (Benchmark, context switch)
|
||||
--- Score : 931272 ctxswc/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.5 (Benchmark, threads, full cycle)
|
||||
--- Score : 157855 threads/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.6 (Benchmark, threads, create only)
|
||||
--- Score : 233196 threads/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.7 (Benchmark, mass reschedule, 5 threads)
|
||||
--- Score : 64413 reschedules/S, 386478 ctxswc/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.8 (Benchmark, round robin context switching)
|
||||
--- Score : 475640 ctxswc/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.9 (Benchmark, I/O Queues throughput)
|
||||
--- Score : 629324 bytes/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.10 (Benchmark, virtual timers set/reset)
|
||||
--- Score : 655914 timers/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.11 (Benchmark, semaphores wait/signal)
|
||||
--- Score : 778572 wait+signal/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.12 (Benchmark, mutexes lock/unlock)
|
||||
--- Score : 576896 lock+unlock/S
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
--- Test Case 11.13 (Benchmark, RAM footprint)
|
||||
--- System: 404 bytes
|
||||
--- Thread: 72 bytes
|
||||
--- Timer : 20 bytes
|
||||
--- Semaph: 12 bytes
|
||||
--- EventS: 4 bytes
|
||||
--- EventL: 16 bytes
|
||||
--- Mutex : 16 bytes
|
||||
--- CondV.: 8 bytes
|
||||
--- Queue : 36 bytes
|
||||
--- MailB.: 40 bytes
|
||||
--- Result: SUCCESS
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Final result: SUCCESS
|
||||
|
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void _pal_lld_init(const PALConfig *config) {
|
|||
RCC->AHBLPENR |= AHB_LPEN_MASK;
|
||||
#elif defined(STM32F0XX)
|
||||
rccEnableAHB(AHB_EN_MASK, TRUE);
|
||||
#elif defined(STM32F30X)
|
||||
#elif defined(STM32F30X) || defined(STM32F37X)
|
||||
rccEnableAHB(AHB_EN_MASK, TRUE);
|
||||
#elif defined(STM32F2XX) || defined(STM32F4XX)
|
||||
RCC->AHB1ENR |= AHB1_EN_MASK;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -120,6 +120,7 @@
|
|||
(backported to 2.4.3).
|
||||
- FIX: Fixed wrong SPI path in platform_f105_f107.mk (bug 3598151).
|
||||
- FIX: Fixed PHY powerdown issues not fixed (bug 3596911).
|
||||
- NEW: Added preliminary support to the STM32F37x family.
|
||||
- NEW: Now the general documentation includes data extracted from the low
|
||||
level driver templates. Per-platform/architecture documents are no more
|
||||
required and will be replaced with technical articles and examples for
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue