Create the dacfifo/adcfifo infrastructure with procedures.
This will allow moving the parameters of the dac/adcfifo inside
the block design so it can be calculated based on other parameters.
Current implementation does not supports updated versions of Vivado
e.g. 2017.4.1 or 2018.2.1
This fix ignores the update number from the version checking.
Registers from this component can fit in the 2k address range.
Since Vivado's minimal address range is 4k, use that instead.
This will allow placing the independent TPLs to base addresses
that mach the addresses from the monolithic blocks ensuring no software
intervention.
The DMAC has the requirement that the length of the transfer is aligned to
the widest interface width. E.g. if the widest interface is 256 bit or 32
bytes the length of the transfer needs to be a multiple of 32.
This restriction can be relaxed for the memory mapped interfaces. This is
done by partially ignoring data of a beat from/to the MM interface.
For write access the stb bits are used to mask out bytes that do not
contain valid data.
For read access a full beat is read but part of the data is discarded. This
works fine as long as the read access is side effect free. I.e. this method
should not be used to access data from memory mapped peripherals like a
FIFO.
This means that for example the length alignment requirement of a DMA
configured for a 64-bit memory and a 16-bit streaming interface is now only
2 bytes instead of 8 bytes as before.
Note that the address alignment requirement is not affected by this. The
address still needs to be aligned to the width of the MM interface that it
belongs to.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
FPGAs support different widths for the read and write port of the block
SRAM cells. The DMAC can make use of this feature when the source and
destination interface have a different width to up-size/down-size the data
bus.
Using memory cells with asymmetric port width consumes the same amount of
SRAM cells, but allows to bypass the re-size blocks inside the DMAC that
are otherwise used for up- and down-sizing. This reduces overall resource
usage and can improve timing.
If the ratio between the destination and source port is too larger to be
handled by SRAM alone the SRAM block will be configured to do partial up-
or down-sizing and a resize block will be inserted to take care of the
remaining up-/down-sizing. E.g. if a 256-bit interface is connected to a
32-bit interface the SRAM will be used to do an initial resizing of 256 bit
to 64 bit and a resize block will be used to do the remaining resizing from
64 bit to 32 bit.
Currently this feature is disabled for Intel FPGAs since Quartus does not
properly infer a block RAM with different read and write port widths from
the current ad_asym_mem module. Once that has been resolved support for
asymmetric memories can also be enabled in the DMAC.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The handling of the src_data_valid_bytes signal and its related signal is
tightly coupled to the behavior of the resize_src module. The code that
handles it makes assumptions about the internal behavior of the resize_src
module.
Move the handling of the src_data_valid_bytes signal when upsizing the data
bus into the resize_src module so that all the code that is related is in
the same place and the code outside of the module does not have to care
about the internals.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The DMA_LENGTH_ALIGN LSBs of all length For the most part the tools are
able to deduce this using constant propagation.
But this propagation does not work across the asynchronous meta data FIFO
in the burst memory module.
Add a DMA_LENGTH_ALIGN parameter to the burst_memory module which is used
to explicitly keep the LSBs of length registers on the destination side
fixed at 1'b1. This reduces resource use and improves timing by allowing
better constant propagation and unused logic elimination.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This simplifies the burst length in the response manager significantly
while not costing much extra resources in the burst memory.
This change will also enable other future improvements.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
One of the major features of the DMAC is being able to handle non matching
interface widths for the destination and source side.
Currently the test benches only support the case where the width for the
source and the destination side are the same. Extend them so that it is
possible to also test and verify setups where the width is not the same.
To accomplish this each byte memory location is treated as if it contained
the lower 8 bytes of its address. And then the written/read data is
compared to the expected data based on that.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
On Arria10 there are 6 transceivers in a single bank. If more than 6
transceivers are used these will end up in multiple banks.
The ATX PLL can directly connect to the transceivers in the same bank
through the 1x clock network. To connect to transceivers in another bank it
has to go through a master clock generation block (MCGB) and the xN clock
network.
Add support for instantiating the MCGB if more than 6 lanes are used. In
this case the first 6 transceivers will still have a direct connection to
the PLL while all other transceivers will be clocked by the MCGB.
Note that this requires that the first 6 transceivers are all in the same
bank.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
All projects have been updated to use the new pack/unpack infrastructure.
The old util_cpack and util_upack cores are now unused an can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fornero <matt.fornero@mathworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fornero <matt.fornero@mathworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>