From b6d5dbf1fc96fee2c9412e6b0bf1fe5aa94852d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Istvan Csomortani Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:10:03 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] license: GPL must be GPL v2 --- LICENSE | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE index b2ab8c001..731f5fdfb 100644 --- a/LICENSE +++ b/LICENSE @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ which license they want to use, (and the rights and obligations they have). - The ADI BSD license, which allows you to make bit files, and not release your source, as long as it attaches to an ADI device. This is not truly open source, since it does place extra restrictions on developers. - - The GPL 2 license, which allows you to make bit files, but you must release + - The GPL v2 license, which allows you to make bit files, but you must release all other HDL (except vendor produced, which we consider as a run-time library), permitted by GPL section 3, along with your bit file. This is truly open source, and places no additional restrictions on use or fields of endeavor. The